ORIGINAL PAPER
Free Access

Implementation of maternal blood cell‐free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies

M. M. Gil

Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
M. S. Quezada

Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
B. Bregant

Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
M. Ferraro

Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
K. H. Nicolaides

Corresponding Author

Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK

Department of Fetal Medicine, University College Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence: Prof. K. H. Nicolaides, Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK (e‐mail:

kypros@fetalmedicine.com

)
Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 June 2013
Cited by: 81

ABSTRACT

Objective

To explore the feasibility of routine maternal blood cell‐free (cf) DNA testing in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 at 10 weeks' gestation.

Method

In this prospective study, women attending The Fetal Medicine Centre in London, UK, between October 2012 and April 2013, with singleton pregnancy and live fetus with CRL 32–45 mm, were screened for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by cfDNA testing at 10 weeks and the combined test at 12 weeks.

Results

cfDNA testing was performed in 1005 singleton pregnancies with a median maternal age of 37 (range, 20–49) years. Risks for trisomies were provided for 957 (95.2%) cases and in 98.0% these were available within 14 days from sampling. In 48 (4.8%) cases no result was provided due to problems with delivery to the laboratory, low fetal fraction or assay failure. Repeat sampling was performed in 40 cases and a result obtained in 27 (67.5%) of these. In 11 cases the risk score for trisomy 21 and in five cases that for trisomy 18 was > 99%, in one the risk for trisomy 13 was 34% and in 968 the risk for each of the three trisomies was < 0.01%. The suspected trisomies were confirmed by karyotyping after chorionic villus sampling (CVS), except in one case of trisomy 18 in which the karyotype was normal. On the basis of the maternal age distribution of the study population, the expected and observed numbers for each of the three trisomies were similar. Both cfDNA and combined testing detected all trisomies, but the estimated false‐positive rates (FPR) were 0.1% and 3.4%, respectively.

Conclusion

Routine screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by cfDNA testing at 10 weeks is feasible and has a lower FPR than does combined testing, but abnormal results require confirmation by CVS. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Number of times cited: 81

  • , Cell-Free DNA–Based Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Common Aneuploidies in a Canadian Province: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.05.015, 40, 1, (48-60), (2018).
  • , Perinatal outcomes following cell‐free DNA screening in >32 000 women: Clinical follow‐up data from a single tertiary center, Prenatal Diagnosis, 38, 10, (755-764), (2018).
  • , Screening for trisomies 21 and 18 in a Spanish public hospital: from the combined test to the cell-free DNA test, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 10.1080/14767058.2016.1253062, 30, 20, (2476-2482), (2016).
  • , A prospective clinical trial to compare the performance of dried blood spots prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome with conventional non-invasive testing technology, Experimental Biology and Medicine, 242, 5, (547), (2017).
  • , Management and outcomes of cystic hygromas: experience of a tertiary center, Journal of Ultrasound, 20, 2, (127), (2017).
  • , Noninvasive Prenatal DNA Testing: The Vanguard of Genomic Medicine, Annual Review of Medicine, 10.1146/annurev-med-072115-033220, 68, 1, (459-472), (2017).
  • , Le dépistage prénatal non invasif de la trisomie 21. Étude rétrospective à propos de 8821 patientes, La Revue Sage-Femme, 16, 4, (243), (2017).
  • , Noninvasive Cell-Free DNA Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy in Maternal Blood, Molecular Diagnostics, 10.1016/B978-0-12-802971-8.00024-9, (423-443), (2017).
  • , Comparison of first‐tier cell‐free DNA screening for common aneuploidies with conventional publically funded screening, Prenatal Diagnosis, 37, 12, (1238-1244), (2017).
  • , Cell-Free DNA Screening, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000342, 71, 8, (477-487), (2016).
  • , Le dépistage prénatal non invasif de la trisomie 21. Étude rétrospective à propos de 8821 patientes, Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 45, 9, (1127), (2016).
  • , Chromosomal abnormalities not currently detected by cell-free fetal DNA: a retrospective analysis at a single center, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.025, 214, 6, (729.e1-729.e11), (2016).
  • , Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is there still a value in a nuchal translucency screening ultrasound in conjunction with maternal plasma non‐invasive cell‐free DNA testing?, Prenatal Diagnosis, 36, 1, (20-24), (2015).
  • , The Integration of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening into the Existing Prenatal Paradigm: a Survey of Current Genetic Counseling Practice, Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25, 5, (1032), (2016).
  • , Should cell‐free fetal DNA be included in first trimester screening (FTS) for common trisomy? A possible scenario on 6697 women screened over 10 years, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 22, 6, (903-910), (2016).
  • , Strategies for Implementing Cell-Free DNA Testing, Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 10.1016/j.cll.2016.01.010, 36, 2, (213-226), (2016).
  • , Cell‐free DNA testing in the maternal blood in high‐risk pregnancies after first‐trimester combined screening, Prenatal Diagnosis, 36, 3, (232-236), (2016).
  • , Localizing NIPT: Practices and meanings of non-invasive prenatal testing in China, Italy, Brazil and the UK, Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 2, 3, (392), (2016).
  • , NIPTRIC: an online tool for clinical interpretation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results, Scientific Reports, 6, 1, (2016).
  • , Non‐invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: Consumers' perspectives, American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 170, 2, (375-385), (2015).
  • , The implications of non‐invasive prenatal testing failures: a review of an under‐discussed phenomenon, Prenatal Diagnosis, 36, 5, (391-396), (2016).
  • , A Forward Look At Noninvasive Prenatal Testing, Trends in Molecular Medicine, 22, 11, (958), (2016).
  • , Clinical implementation of NIPT – technical and biological challenges, Clinical Genetics, 89, 5, (523-530), (2015).
  • , Clinical implementation of routine screening for fetal trisomies in the UK NHS: cell‐free DNA test contingent on results from first‐trimester combined test, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 47, 1, (45-52), (2015).
  • , IONA test for first‐trimester detection of trisomies 21, 18 and 13, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 47, 2, (184-187), (2015).
  • , Analysis of cell‐free DNA in maternal blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta‐analysis, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 45, 3, (249-266), (2015).
  • , Noninvasive Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis Using Cell‐free Fetal DNA, Genetic Disorders and the Fetus, (453-482), (2015).
  • , Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening, European Journal of Human Genetics, 23, 11, (1438), (2015).
  • , ADN fœtal libre dans le sang maternel, Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 43, 2, (163), (2015).
  • , Discrepancy in fetal sex assignment between cell free fetal DNA and ultrasound, Journal of Perinatology, 10.1038/jp.2014.231, 35, 3, (229-230), (2015).
  • , Use of the Combined First‐Trimester Screen in High‐ and Low‐Risk Patient Populations After Introduction of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 34, 8, (1423-1428), (2015).
  • , Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: NIPT for chromosome abnormalities should be offered to women with low a priori risk, Prenatal Diagnosis, 35, 1, (8-14), (2015).
  • , Non-invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome abnormalities: a source of confusion, Case Reports, 10.1136/bcr-2014-207309, 2015, jan28 1, (bcr2014207309-bcr2014207309), (2015).
  • , Overview of the impact of noninvasive prenatal testing on diagnostic procedures, Prenatal Diagnosis, 35, 10, (972-979), (2015).
  • , Use of amniotic fluid for determining pregnancies at risk of preterm birth and for studying diseases of potential environmental etiology, Environmental Research, 136, (470), (2015).
  • , Noninvasive prenatal test for the pregnancy with Turner syndrome mosaicism 45, X/47, XXX: A case report, Journal of Genetic Medicine, 12, 2, (118), (2015).
  • , Initial experience with non-invasive prenatal testing of cell-free DNA for major chromosomal anomalies in a clinical setting, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 28, 10, (1196), (2015).
  • , Cell free DNA testing–interpretation of results using an online calculator, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 213, 1, (30.e1), (2015).
  • , Uptake of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and impact on invasive procedures in a tertiary referral center, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 292, 3, (543), (2015).
  • , Implementation of whole genome massively parallel sequencing for noninvasive prenatal testing in laboratories, Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 10.1586/14737159.2015.973857, 15, 1, (111-124), (2014).
  • , Cracking the Code of Human Diseases Using Next-Generation Sequencing: Applications, Challenges, and Perspectives, BioMed Research International, 10.1155/2015/161648, 2015, (1-15), (2015).
  • , Cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy as a clinical service, Clinical Biochemistry, 48, 15, (932), (2015).
  • , A cost‐effectiveness analysis of cell free DNA as a replacement for serum screening for Down syndrome, Prenatal Diagnosis, 35, 5, (440-446), (2015).
  • , Non‐invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13: clinical experience from 146 958 pregnancies, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 45, 5, (530-538), (2015).
  • , Screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by cell‐free DNA analysis of maternal blood at 10–11 weeks' gestation and the combined test at 11–13 weeks, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 45, 1, (36-41), (2014).
  • , Clinical implementation of cell‐free DNA‐based aneuploidy screening: perspectives from a national audit, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 45, 1, (10-15), (2015).
  • , UK NHS pilot study on cell‐free DNA testing in screening for fetal trisomies: factors affecting uptake, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 45, 1, (67-73), (2014).
  • , Ultrasonographic fetal soft markers in a low‐risk population: prevalence, association with trisomies and invasive tests, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 93, 4, (367-373), (2014).
  • , The utilization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA testing and decrease in invasive diagnostic procedures: an institutional experience, Journal of Perinatology, 10.1038/jp.2014.102, 34, 10, (750-753), (2014).
  • , Impact of noninvasive prenatal testing in regionally dispersed medical centers in the United States, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.065, 211, 4, (368.e1-368.e7), (2014).
  • , Physician Liability and Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 36, 10, (907), (2014).
  • , Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: should noninvasive DNA testing be the standard screening test for Down syndrome in all pregnant women?, Prenatal Diagnosis, 34, 1, (6-11), (2013).
  • , Zukunft der Pränataldiagnostik, Der Gynäkologe, 47, 8, (559), (2014).
  • , B. Hofmann svarer:, Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening, 134, 3, (266), (2014).
  • , Prenatal screening for structural congenital heart disease, Nature Reviews Cardiology, 11, 6, (323), (2014).
  • , Bedre spesifisitet gir mindre skade av friske fostre, Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening, 134, 3, (266), (2014).
  • , Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism–Based Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in a High-Risk and Low-Risk Cohort, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 124, 2, PART 1, (210), (2014).
  • , Role of the second‐trimester ‘genetic sonogram’ for Down syndrome screen in the era of first‐trimester screening and noninvasive prenatal testing, Prenatal Diagnosis, 34, 6, (511-517), (2014).
  • , Use of Cell-Free Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma for Noninvasive Prenatal Screening, Clinics in Perinatology, 41, 4, (957), (2014).
  • , Noninvasive prenatal testing: Known knowns and known unknowns, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 54, 5, (397-399), (2014).
  • , Wie verlässlich ist der Nachweis fetaler Trisomien aus mütterlichem Blut?, gynäkologie + geburtshilfe, 19, 2, (22), (2014).
  • , Fosterdiagnostikk med blodprøver, Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening, 134, 4, (388), (2014).
  • , Clinical experience and follow-up with large scale single-nucleotide polymorphism–based noninvasive prenatal aneuploidy testing, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 211, 5, (527.e1), (2014).
  • , DNA Sequencing versus Standard Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening, New England Journal of Medicine, 370, 9, (799), (2014).
  • , What does next-generation sequencing mean for prenatal diagnosis?, Biomarkers in Medicine, 8, 4, (499), (2014).
  • , Diagnostic accuracy of random massively parallel sequencing for non‐invasive prenatal detection of common autosomal aneuploidies: a collaborative study in Europe, Prenatal Diagnosis, 34, 2, (185-191), (2013).
  • , The price of performance: a cost and performance analysis of the implementation of cell‐free fetal DNA testing for Down syndrome in Ontario, Canada, Prenatal Diagnosis, 34, 4, (350-356), (2014).
  • , Repeated failed non‐invasive prenatal testing owing to low cell‐free fetal DNA fraction and increased variance in a woman with severe autoimmune disease, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 44, 2, (242-243), (2014).
  • , Discordant results between fetal cell‐free DNA in maternal plasma and chorionic villus sampling in a first‐trimester fetus with increased nuchal translucency and megacystis, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 44, 3, (369-369), (2014).
  • , Nuchal translucency in twins according to mode of assisted conception and chorionicity, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 44, 1, (38-43), (2014).
  • , Non‐invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities by low‐coverage whole‐genome sequencing of maternal plasma DNA: review of 1982 consecutive cases in a single center, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 43, 3, (254-264), (2014).
  • , Editor's Note, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 43, 1, (1-2), (2014).
  • , False‐negative trisomy 18 non‐invasive prenatal test result due to 48,XXX,+18 placental mosaicism, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 43, 4, (477-478), (2014).
  • , What will be the role of first‐trimester ultrasound if cell‐free DNA screening for aneuploidy becomes routine?, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 44, 6, (621-630), (2014).
  • , Counseling for non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): what pregnant women may want to know, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 44, 1, (1-5), (2014).
  • , Non‐invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 42, 1, (15-33), (2013).
  • , Non‐invasive prenatal testing: more questions than answers, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 42, 4, (369-372), (2013).
  • , Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10.1002/14651858.CD011767.pub2, (2017).
  • , Exploring Preterm Birth as a Polymicrobial Disease: An Overview of the Uterine Microbiome, Frontiers in Immunology, 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00595, 5, (2014).
  • , Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Using Cell Free DNA in Maternal Plasma: Recent Developments and Future Prospects, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10.3390/jcm3020537, 3, 2, (537-565), (2014).
  • , A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First Trimester Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening for Fetal Trisomies in the United States, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0131402, 10, 7, (e0131402), (2015).