Volume 45, Issue 5 p. 453-456

Oronasopharyngeal suction versus no suction in normal, term and vaginally born infants: A prospective randomised controlled trial

Sadettin GUNGOR

Corresponding Author

Sadettin GUNGOR

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and

Correspondence: Dr Sadettin Gungor, GATA Kadin Hastaliklari ve Dogum Anabilim Dalı, 06018 Etlik/Ankara, Turkey. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Ertan TEKSOZ

Ertan TEKSOZ

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gulhane Military Medical Academy and Medical School, Ankara, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Temel CEYHAN

Temel CEYHAN

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and

Search for more papers by this author
Ercan KURT

Ercan KURT

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gulhane Military Medical Academy and Medical School, Ankara, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Umit GOKTOLGA

Umit GOKTOLGA

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and

Search for more papers by this author
İskender BASER

İskender BASER

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 September 2005
Citations: 44

Abstract

This prospective randomised controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of oronasopharyngeal suction with those of no suction in normal, term and vaginally born infants and was performed at a Turkish tertiary hospital from June 2003 to January 2004. A total of 140 newborns were enrolled in the trial (n = 70 per group). The no suction group showed lower mean heart rates through the 3rd and 6th minutes and higher SaO2 values through the first 6 mins of life (P < 0.001). The maximum time to reach SaO2 of ≥ 92% (6 vs. 11 min) and ≥ 86% (5 vs. 8 min) were shorter in the no suction group (P < 0.001).