Volume 119, Issue 13 p. 1597-1605
Epidemiology

The association between female genital mutilation and intimate partner violence

HM Salihu

HM Salihu

Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL

Search for more papers by this author
EM August

EM August

Department of Community & Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL

Search for more papers by this author
JL Salemi

JL Salemi

Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL

Search for more papers by this author
H Weldeselasse

H Weldeselasse

Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL

Search for more papers by this author
YS Sarro

YS Sarro

Center for TB and AIDS Research in Mali (SEREFO), University of Bamako, Bamako, Mali

Search for more papers by this author
AP Alio

AP Alio

Department of Community & Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 August 2012
Citations: 18
Dr H Salihu, University of South Florida, College of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., MDC56, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Email [email protected]

Abstract

Please cite this paper as: Salihu H, August E, Salemi J, Weldeselasse H, Sarro Y, Alio A. The association between female genital mutilation and intimate partner violence. BJOG 2012;119:1597–1605.

Objective To determine whether female genital mutilation (FGM) is a risk factor for intimate partner violence (IPV) and its subtypes (physical, sexual and emotional).

Design Population-based cross-sectional study.

Setting The study used the 2006 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) conducted in Mali.

Population A total of 7875 women aged 15–49 years who responded to the domestic violence and female circumcision modules in the 2006 administration of the DHS in Mali.

Methods Multivariable logistic regression was used to compute adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to measure risk for IPV.

Main outcome measures The outcomes of interest were IPV and its subtypes.

Results Women with FGM were at heightened odds of IPV (aOR 2.71, 95% CI 2.17–3.38) and IPV subtypes: physical (aOR 2.85, 95% CI 2.22–3.66), sexual (aOR 3.24, 95% CI 1.80–5.82), and emotional (aOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.68–3.11). The odds of IPV increased with ascending FGM severity (P for trend <0.0001). The most elevated odds were observed among women with severe FGM, who were nearly nine times as likely to experience more than one IPV subtype (aOR 8.81, 95% CI 5.87–13.24).

Conclusions Study findings underscore the need for multi-tiered strategies, incorporating policy and education, to reduce FGM and IPV, potentially improving the holistic health and wellbeing of Malian women.