BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Systematic review

Shift work and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of currently available epidemiological studies

M Bonzini

Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Research Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese

Occupational Medicine Unit, Ospedale di Circolo-Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

KT Palmer,

KT Palmer

MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author

D Coggon,

D Coggon

MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author

M Carugno,

M Carugno

Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS Foundation, University of Milan, Milan

Search for more papers by this author

A Cromi,

A Cromi

Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Research Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese

Obstetrics and Gynecology Departement, Ospedale di Circolo-Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

MM Ferrario,

MM Ferrario

Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Research Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese

Occupational Medicine Unit, Ospedale di Circolo-Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

M Bonzini,

M Bonzini

Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Research Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese

Occupational Medicine Unit, Ospedale di Circolo-Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

KT Palmer,

KT Palmer

MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author

D Coggon,

D Coggon

MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author

M Carugno,

M Carugno

Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS Foundation, University of Milan, Milan

Search for more papers by this author

A Cromi,

A Cromi

Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Research Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese

Obstetrics and Gynecology Departement, Ospedale di Circolo-Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

MM Ferrario,

MM Ferrario

Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Research Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese

Occupational Medicine Unit, Ospedale di Circolo-Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 27 July 2011

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03066.x

Citations: 114

M Bonzini, Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Research Centre, University of Insubria, Viale Borri 57, 21100 Varese, Italy. Email [email protected]

Share a link

Email
Facebook
x
LinkedIn
Reddit
Wechat

Abstract

Please cite this paper as: Bonzini M, Palmer K, Coggon D, Carugno M, Cromi A, Ferrario M. Shift work and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of currently available epidemiological studies. BJOG 2011;118:1429–1437.

Background Varying work schedules are suspected of increasing risks to pregnant women and to fetal wellbeing. In particular, maternal hormonal disturbance arising from sleep deprivation or circadian rhythm disruption might impair fetal growth or lead to complications of pregnancy. Two independent meta-analyses (from 2000 to 2007) reported a small adverse effect of shift work on the risk of preterm delivery (PTD). However, these reviews were based on few high-quality studies.

Objectives To provide an updated review of the associations of shift work with PTD, low birthweight (LBW), small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants and pre-eclampsia.

Search strategy and selection criteria We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE using combinations of keywords and MeSH terms.

Data collection and analysis For each relevant paper we abstracted standard details, used to summarise design features and rate methodological quality. We calculated pooled estimates of relative risk (RR) in random-effect meta-analyses.

Main results We retrieved 23 relevant studies. The pooled estimate of RR for PTD was 1.16 (95% CI 1.00–1.33, 16 studies), but when five reports of poorer methodological quality were excluded, the estimated RR decreased to 1.03 (95% CI 0.93–1.14). We also observed increased RRs for LBW (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.93–1.74) and for SGA (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03–1.22), which varied little by study quality. Little evidence was found on pre-eclampsia.

Conclusions These findings suggest that overall, any risk of PTD, LBW, or SGA arising from shift work in pregnancy is small.

References

1 Chamberlain GV. Work in pregnancy. Am J Ind Med 1993; 23: 559–75.
10.1002/ajim.4700230405
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
2 Gabbe SG, Turner LP. Reproductive hazards of the American lifestyle: work during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 826–32.
10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70607-0
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
3 Mozurkewich EL, Luke B, Avni M, Wolf FM. Working conditions and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 623–35.
10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00598-0
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
4 Wergeland E, Strand K. Working conditions and prevalence of pre-eclampsia, Norway 1989. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997; 58: 189–96.
10.1016/S0020-7292(97)00083-0
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
5 Nurminen T. Shift work, fetal development and course of pregnancy. Scand J Work Environ Health 1989; 15: 395–403.
10.5271/sjweh.1833
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
6 Barker DJ. The developmental origins of adult disease. J Am Coll Nutr 2004; 23(6 Suppl): 588S–95S.
10.1080/07315724.2004.10719428
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
7 Barker DJ. Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 270–83.
10.1097/00003081-200606000-00009
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
8 Hattersley AT, Tooke JE. The fetal insulin hypothesis: an alternative explanation of the association of low birthweight with diabetes and vascular disease. Lancet 1999; 353: 1789–92.
10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07546-1
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
9 Bonzini M, Coggon D, Palmer KT. Risk of prematurity, low birthweight and pre-eclampsia in relation to working hours and physical activities: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2007; 64: 228–43.
10.1136/oem.2006.026872
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
10 Niedhammer I, O’Mahony D, Daly S, Morrison JJ, Kelleher CC. Occupational predictors of pregnancy outcomes in Irish working women in the Lifeways cohort. BJOG 2009; 116: 943–52.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02160.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
11 Gardosi J, Chang A, Kalyan B, Sahota D, Symonds EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992; 339: 283–7.
10.1016/0140-6736(92)91342-6
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
12 Abeysena C, Jayawardana P, De A Seneviratne R. Maternal sleep deprivation is a risk factor for small for gestational age: a cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49: 382–7.
10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01010.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
13 Haelterman E, Marcoux S, Croteau A, Dramaix M. Population-based study on occupational risk factors for preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. Scand J Work Environ Health 2007; 33: 304–17.
10.5271/sjweh.1147
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
14 Ariens GA, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Bouter LM, van der Wal G. Physical risk factors for neck pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 2000; 26: 7–19.
10.5271/sjweh.504
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
15 van der Windt DA, Thomas E, Pope DP, de Winter AF, Macfarlane GJ, Bouter LM, et al. Occupational risk factors for shoulder pain: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2000; 57: 433–42.
10.1136/oem.57.7.433
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
16 Normand SL. Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting. Stat Med 1999; 18: 321–59.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990215)18:3<321::AID-SIM28>3.0.CO;2-P
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
17 Hartikainen-Sorri AL, Sorri M. Occupational and socio-medical factors in preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 13–6.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
18 Stinson JC, Lee KA. Premature labor and birth: influence of rank and perception of fatigue in active duty military women. Mil Med 2003; 168: 385–90.
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
19 Zhu JL, Hjollund NH, Olsen J. Shift work, duration of pregnancy, and birth weight: the National Birth Cohort in Denmark. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 285–91.
10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.002
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
20 Croteau A, Marcoux S, Brisson C. Work activity in pregnancy, preventive measures, and the risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 846–55.
10.2105/AJPH.2004.058552
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
21 Bonzini M, Coggon D, Godfrey K, Inskip H, Crozier S, Palmer KT. Occupational physical activities, working hours and outcome of pregnancy: findings from the Southampton Women’s Survey. Occup Environ Med 2009; 66: 685–90.
10.1136/oem.2008.043935
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
22 Misra DP, Strobino DM, Stashinko EE, Nagey DA, Nanda J. Effects of physical activity on preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 628–35.
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009503
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
23 Pompeii LA, Savitz DA, Evenson KR, Rogers B, McMahon M. Physical exertion at work and the risk of preterm delivery and small-for-gestational-age birth. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 1279–88.
10.1097/01.AOG.0000189080.76998.f8
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
24 Xu X, Ding M, Li B, Christiani DC. Association of rotating shiftwork with preterm births and low birth weight among never smoking women textile workers in China. Occup Environ Med 1994; 51: 470–4.
10.1136/oem.51.7.470
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
25 McDonald AD, McDonald JC, Armstrong B, Cherry NM, Nolin AD, Robert D. Prematurity and work in pregnancy. Br J Ind Med 1988; 45: 56–62.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
26 Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Kaminski M. Pregnant women’s working conditions and their changes during pregnancy: a national study in France. Br J Ind Med 1987; 44: 236–43.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
27 Bodin L, Axelsson G, Ahlborg G Jr. The association of shift work and nitrous oxide exposure in pregnancy with birth weight and gestational age. Epidemiology 1999; 10: 429–36.
10.1097/00001648-199907000-00015
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
28 Luke B, Mamelle N, Keith L, Munoz F, Minogue J, Papiernik E, et al. The association between occupational factors and preterm birth: a United States nurses’ study. Research Committee of the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 849–62.
10.1016/0002-9378(95)90354-2
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
29 Mamelle N, Laumon B, Lazar P. Prematurity and occupational activity during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119: 309–22.
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113750
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
30 Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Zeitlin J, Lelong N, Papiernik E, Di Renzo GC, Breart G. Employment, working conditions, and preterm birth: results from the Europop case-control survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58: 395–401.
10.1136/jech.2003.008029
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
31 Fortier I, Marcoux S, Brisson J. Maternal work during pregnancy and the risks of delivering a small-for-gestational-age or preterm infant. Scand J Work Environ Health 1995; 21: 412–8.
10.5271/sjweh.56
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
32 Stengel B, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Kaminski M. Healthy worker effect and pregnancy: role of adverse obstetric history and social characteristics. J Epidemiol Community Health 1987; 41: 312–20.
10.1136/jech.41.4.312
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
33 Romero R, Espinoza J, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, Friel LA, Erez O, et al. The use of high-dimensional biology (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) to understand the preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG 2006; 113(Suppl 3): 118–35.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01150.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
34 Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, Hassan S, Erez O, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG 2006; 113(Suppl 3): 17–42.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01120.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
35 Tamura H, Nakamura Y, Terron MP, Flores LJ, Manchester LC, Tan DX, et al. Melatonin and pregnancy in the human. Reprod Toxicol 2008; 25: 291–303.
10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.03.005
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
36 Sharkey JT, Cable C, Olcese J. Melatonin sensitizes human myometrial cells to oxytocin in a protein kinase C alpha/extracellular-signal regulated kinase-dependent manner. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: 2902–8.
10.1210/jc.2009-2137
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
37 Hanke W, Kalinka J, Makowiec-Dabrowska T, Sobala W. Heavy physical work during pregnancy—a risk factor for small-for-gestational-age babies in Poland. Am J Ind Med 1999; 36: 200–5.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199907)36:1<200::AID-AJIM28>3.0.CO;2-Y
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume118, Issue12

November 2011

Pages 1429-1437

Shift work and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of currently available epidemiological studies

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Shift work and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of currently available epidemiological studies

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information