Please cite this paper as: Kelly T, Suddes J, Howel D, Hewison J, Robson S. Comparing medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13–20 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2010;117:1512–1520.

Objective To compare the psychological impact, acceptability and clinical effectiveness of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy (TOP) at 13–20 weeks of gestation.

Design Randomised trial.

Setting Large UK tertiary centre.

Sample Women accepted for TOP at 13–20 weeks of gestation.

Methods Medical TOP (MTOP) using mifepristone and misoprostol or surgical TOP (STOP) by vacuum aspiration at <15 weeks of gestation, and by dilatation and evacuation at 15 or more weeks of gestation.

Main outcome measures Distress 2 weeks after TOP, measured by the impact of events scale (IES), and acceptability, measured by the proportion of women who would opt for the same procedure again.

Results One hundred and twenty two women were randomised: 60 to the MTOP group and 62 to the STOP group. Twelve women opted to continue their pregnancy. Follow-up rates were low (n = 66/110; 60%). At 2 weeks post-procedure there was no difference in total IES score between groups. However, compared with women undergoing STOP, women undergoing MTOP had a higher score on the IES intrusion subscale (mean difference 6.6; 95% CI 1.4–11.8), and a higher score on the general health questionnaire (GHQ) (P = 0.033). Women found STOP more acceptable: compared with MTOP, more women would opt for the same procedure again (100% versus 53%, P ≤ 0.001), and fewer women found the experience to be worse than expected (0% versus 53%, P = 0.001). Women who had MTOP experienced more bleeding (P = 0.003), more pain on the day of the procedure (P = 0.008), and more days of pain (P = 0.020). Of the 107 women who declined to participate, 58 (67%) preferred a STOP.

Conclusions Randomised trials of women requesting midtrimester TOP are challenging. Women found STOP less painful and more acceptable than MTOP.

References

1 DOH. Abortion Statistics, England and Wales 2008. London: Department of Health, 2009. [http://www.dh.gov.uk/dr_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_099714.pdf]: Statistical Bulletin, 2009.
Google Scholar
2 RCOG. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion: Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 7. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2004.
Google Scholar
3 Say L, Kulier R, Gulmezoglu M, Campana A. Medical versus surgical methods for first trimester termination of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 2007: Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003037. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003037.pub2.
Google Scholar
4 Lohr PA, Hayes JL, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006714. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006714.pub2.).
10.1002/14651858.CD006714.pub2
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
5 Grimes DA, Hulka JF, McCutchen ME. Midtrimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation versus intra-amniotic instillation of prostaglandin F2a – a randomised clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 785–90.
10.1016/0002-9378(80)90886-8
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
6 Grimes DA, Smith MS, Witham AD. Mifepristone and misoprostol versus dilation and evacuation for midtrimester abortion: a pilot randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2004; 111: 148–53.
10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.00044.x-i1
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
7 Kaltreider NB, Goldsmith S, Margolis AJ. The impact of midtrimester abortion techniques on patients and staff. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 135: 235–8.
10.1016/0002-9378(79)90351-X
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
8 Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and another [1985] 3 All ER 402 (HL).
Google Scholar
9 Goldberg DP. Manual of the general health questionnaire. Windsor, England: NFER Publishing, 1978.
Google Scholar
10 Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361–70.
10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
11 Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of event scale – measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979; 41: 209–18.
10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
12 Sundin MJ, Horowitz MJ. Impact of event scale: psychometric properties. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 180: 205–9.
10.1192/bjp.180.3.205
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
13 WHO. The Prevention and Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage: report of a Technical Working Group, Geneva 3–6 July 1989. Geneva: WHO, 1990.
Google Scholar
14 Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann 1979; 2: 197–207.
10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
15 Hunfield J, Wladimiroff J, Passchier J. The grief of late pregnancy loss. Patient Educ Couns 1997; 31: 57–64.
10.1016/S0738-3991(97)01008-2
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
16 Henshaw RC, Naji AA, Russell IT, Templeton AA. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women’s preferences and acceptability of treatment. BMJ 1993; 307: 714–7.
10.1136/bmj.307.6906.714
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
17 Ashok PW, Kidd A, Flett GM, Fitzmaurice A, Graham W, Templeton A. A randomized comparison of medical abortion and surgical vacuum aspiration at 10–13 weeks gestation. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 92–8.
10.1093/humrep/17.1.92
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
18 Robson SC, Kelly T, Howel D, Deverill M, Hewison J, Lie MLS, et al. Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks’ gestation (TOPS). Health Technol Assess 2009; 13: 1–148.
10.3310/hta13530
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
19 Rørbye C, Nørgaard M, Nilas L. Medical versus surgical abortion efficacy, complications and leave of absence compared in a partly randomized study. Contraception 2004; 70: 393–9.
10.1016/j.contraception.2004.06.004
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
20 Henshaw R, Naji S, Russell I, Templeton A. Psychological responses following medical abortion (using mifepristone and gemeprost) and surgical vacuum aspiration – a patient-centered, partially randomized prospective-study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 812–8.
10.3109/00016349409072511
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
21 Ashok PW, Hamoda H, Flett GMM, Kidd A, Ftizmaurice A, Templeton A. Psychological sequelae of medical and surgical abortion at 10–13weeks gestation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 761–6.
10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00728.x
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
22 Howie FL, Henshaw RC, Naji SA, Russell IT, Templeton AA. Medical abortion or vacuum aspiration? Two year follow up of a patient preference trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 829–33.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12028.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
23 Broen AN, Moum T, Bodtker AS, Ekeberg O. The course of mental health after miscarriage and induced abortion: a longitudinal, five year follow up study. BMC Medicine 2005, 3:18 doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-3-18.
10.1186/1741-7015-3-18
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
24 Creinin MD. Randomized comparison of efficacy, acceptability and cost of medical versus surgical abortion. Contraception 2000; 62: 117–24.
10.1016/S0010-7824(00)00151-7
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
25 Henshaw RC, Naji SA, Russell IT, Templeton AA. A comparison of medical abortion (using mifepristone and gemeprost) with surgical vacuum aspiration: efficacy and early medical sequelae. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 2167–72.
10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138412
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
26 Ashok PW, Templeton A, Wagaarachchi PT, Flett GMM. Midtrimester medical termination of pregnancy: a review of 1002 consecutive cases. Contraception 2004; 69: 51–8.
10.1016/j.contraception.2003.09.006
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
27 Grimes DA, Schulz KF, Cates W Jr, Tyler CW. Mid-trimester abortion by dilation and evacuation: a safe and practical alternative. N Engl J Med 1977; 296: 1141–5.
10.1056/NEJM197705192962004
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
28 Child TJ, Thomas J, Rees M, Mackenzie IZ. Morbidity of first trimester aspiration termination and the seniority of the surgeon. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 875–8.
10.1093/humrep/16.5.875
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
29 Ashok PW, Hamoda H, Flett GMM, Kidd A, Ftizmaurice A, Templeton A. Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10–13 weeks gestation. Contraception 2005; 71: 143–8.
10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.013
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
30 Slade P, Heke S, Fletcher J, Stewart P. A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 1288–95.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10007.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
31 Ingham R, Lee E, Clements S, Stone S. Second Trimester Abortions in England and Wales. Southampton: University of Southampton, 2007.
Google Scholar
32 Drey EA, Foster DG, Jackson RA, Lee SJ, Cardenas LH, Darney PD. Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 128–35.
10.1097/01.AOG.0000189095.32382.d0
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
33 RCOG. National Audit of Induced Abortion 2000. Audit. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2001.
Google Scholar
34 Roe J, Francome C, Bush M. Recruitment and training of British obstetrician-gynaecologists for abortion provision: conscientious objection versus opting out. Reprod Health Matters 1999; 7: 97–105.
10.1016/S0968-8080(99)90010-1
Google Scholar
35 RCOG. ATSM Advanced Training Skills Modules. 2008 [cited 2008 June]; Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/public/pdf/ATSM_Abortion_care.pdf
Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume117, Issue12

November 2010

Pages 1512-1520

Comparing medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13–20 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Comparing medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13–20 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information