Volume 117, Issue 12 p. 1468-1474
Gynaecological oncology

Proportion of excision and cervical healing after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

C Founta

C Founta

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
M Arbyn

M Arbyn

Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium

European Cooperation on Development and Implementation of Cancer Screening and Prevention Guidelines, IARC, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author
G Valasoulis

G Valasoulis

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
M Kyrgiou

M Kyrgiou

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
A Tsili

A Tsili

Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
P Martin-Hirsch

P Martin-Hirsch

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Central Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK

Search for more papers by this author
N Dalkalitsis

N Dalkalitsis

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
P Karakitsos

P Karakitsos

Department of Cytopathology, Attikon Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
D Kassanos

D Kassanos

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Attikon Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
W Prendiville

W Prendiville

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Gynaecology, Coombe and Tallagh Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Search for more papers by this author
A Loufopoulos

A Loufopoulos

Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
E Paraskevaidis

E Paraskevaidis

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 September 2010
Citations: 36
Dr C Founta, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Stavrou Niarchou 1, 45500, Ioannina, Greece. Email [email protected]

Abstract

Please cite this paper as: Founta C, Arbyn M, Valasoulis G, Kyrgiou M, Tsili A, Martin-Hirsch P, Dalkalitsis N, Karakitsos P, Kassanos D, Prendiville W, Loufopoulos A, Paraskevaidis E. Proportion of excision and cervical healing after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BJOG 2010;117:1468–1474.

Objective To determine how the proportion of the cervical volume excised affects cervical regeneration.

Design Prospective observational study.

Setting University Hospital.

Population Women planning to undergo excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia who wish to have future pregnancies.

Methods The cervical volume (and dimensions) is calculated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before treatment. The volume (and dimensions) of the cone is assessed before fixation by a volumetric tube and a ruler; the percentage (%) of excision is computed. Cervical regeneration is estimated by repeat MRI at 6 months.

Main outcome measures Cervical regeneration in relation to proportion of excision. Statistical analysis was performed by box plots and analysis of variance.

Results A total of 48 women have been recruited; 29 have completed 6 months follow up. Both the total cervical volume (from MRI) before treatment and the volume of the excised/ablated cone varied substantially. The estimated proportion of excision varied significantly between 4% and 39% (median 11%). Multivariate linear regression revealed that the proportional deficit at 6 months post-treatment was determined mainly by the proportion of the excised volume.

Conclusions Careful assessment of risks and benefits of treatment is essential when deciding to treat women who wish to have future pregnancies. Assessment of the proportion of the cervical volume and length excised might identify those that need further surveillance during future pregnancy.