Please cite this paper as: Cameron S, Glasier A, Muir A, Scott G, Johnstone A, Quarrell H, Oroz C, McIntyre M, Miranda D, Todd G. Expedited partner therapy for Chlamydia trachomatis at the community pharmacy. BJOG 2010;117:1074–1079.

Objective Expedited partner treatment (EPT) for uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis at the pharmacy is an alternative approach to partner notification that has not yet been evaluated within the UK. The aim of this study was to evaluate EPT for partners using pharmacies in Lothian.

Design A pilot study over 18 months.

Setting Selected healthcare settings and community pharmacies in Lothian, Scotland, UK.

Population Sexual partners of index cases with uncomplicated C. trachomatis.

Methods Index cases with uncomplicated C. trachomatis were given a pharmacy voucher to pass onto sexual partners. Partners could redeem vouchers for free treatment (azithromycin) at one of 90 pharmacies in the area.

Main outcome measures The main outcome measure was the proportion of vouchers redeemed. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, as determined at a telephone follow-up of a subgroup of female index cases from one study site, 1 month later.

Results In total 577 vouchers were issued to chlamydia-positive index patients of mean age 22.9 years (range 15–47 years). A total of 231 vouchers were redeemed (40%), at a median of 2 days after issue. Only 4% of partners attended a clinic for treatment. Most index patients surveyed reported that partners were satisfied with this method of treatment (48 out of 55; 87%).

Conclusions Expedited partner treatment for uncomplicated chlamydia at a pharmacy is a popular choice, and increases options on where, when and how partners are treated.

References

1 UK national guideline for the management of genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis2006. [http://www.bashh.org/documents/2006/61/61.pdf]. Accessed 3 December 2009.
Google Scholar
2 Mercer CH, Sutcliffe L, Johnson AM, White PJ, Brook G, Ross JD, et al. How much do delayed health care seeking, delayed care provision and diversion from primary care contribute to the transmission of STI’s? Sex Transm Infect 2007; 83: 400–5.
10.1136/sti.2006.024554
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
3 Patton DL, Wolner–Hanssen P, Cosgrove SJ, Holmes KK. The effects of Chlamydia trachomatis on the female reproductive tract of the macara memestrina after a single tubal challenge following repeated inoculations. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 643–50.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [http://www.cdc.gov/std/ept/legal/default.htm] Accessed 4 December 2009.
Google Scholar
5 Kissinger P, Mohammed H, Richardson-Alston G, Leichliter JS, Taylor SN, Martin DH. Patient-delivered partner treatment for male urethritis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41: 623–9.
10.1086/432476
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
6 Golden MR, Whittington WLH, Handsfield HH, Hughes TP, Stamm WE, Hogben M, et al. Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 676–85.
10.1056/NEJMoa041681
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
7 Cameron ST, Glasier A, Scott G, Young H, Melvin L, Johnstone A, et al. Novel interventions to reduce re-infection in women with chlamydia: a randomised controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 888–95.
10.1093/humrep/den475
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
8 Cameron ST, Melvin L, Glasier A, Scott G, Johnstone A, Young H. Willingness of gynaecologists, doctors in family planning, gp’s, practice nurses and pharmacists to adopt novel interventions for treating sexual partners of women with Chlamydia. BJOG 2007; 114: 1516–21.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01506.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
9 Sexual health and hormonal contraception, module 5. NHS Education for Scotland. [http://www.nes.scot.nhs.uk/pharmacy/newcontract/public_health/]. Accessed 1 March 2010.
Google Scholar
10 SIGN guideline no.109. Management of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline network. March 2009 [http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/109/index.html]. Accessed 1 March 2010.
Google Scholar
11 Cameron ST. Patient delivered partner therapy for Chlamydia- a realistic public health measure in the UK. BJOG 2009; 116: 345–6.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01971.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
12 Baraitser P, Pearce V, Holmes J, Horne N, Boynton PM. Chlamydia testing in community pharmacies: evaluation of a feasibility pilot in south east London. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16: 303–7.
10.1136/qshc.2006.020883
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
13 Manavi K, McMillan A, Young H. Genital infection in male partners of women with chlamydial infection. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17: 34–6.
10.1258/095646206775220568
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
14 Melvin L, Cameron ST, Glasier A, Scott G, Johnstone A, Elton R. Preferred strategies of men and women for managing chlamydial infection. BJOG 2009; 116: 357–65.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01977.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
15 Health Protection Scotland 2009. Scotlands sexual health information. NHS Scotland. [http://www.documents.hps.scot.nhs.uk/bbvsti/sti/publications/sshi-2009-11-24.pdf]. Accessed 3 December 2009.
Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume117, Issue9

August 2010

Pages 1074-1079

This article also appears in:

Journal Club

Expedited partner therapy for Chlamydia trachomatis at the community pharmacy

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Expedited partner therapy for Chlamydia trachomatis at the community pharmacy

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information