Volume 122, Issue 4 p. 537-544
Original Article

Intervention during pregnancy to reduce excessive gestational weight gain—a randomised controlled trial

AK Ronnberg

Corresponding Author

AK Ronnberg

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden

Correspondence: Dr AK Ronnberg, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Örebro University Hospital, SE-701 85 Örebro, Sweden. Email [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
I Ostlund

I Ostlund

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
H Fadl

H Fadl

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
T Gottvall

T Gottvall

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
K Nilsson

K Nilsson

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 November 2014
Citations: 48

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate if a feasible, low-cost intervention could decrease the percentage of women gaining weight above the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations on gestational weight gain (GWG) compared with standard maternity care.

Design

A randomised controlled interventional design.

Setting

Antenatal clinics (n = 14) in Örebro county, Sweden, participated.

Population

Healthy women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥19 kg/m2, age ≥18 years and adequate knowledge of Swedish language who signed in for maternity care at ≤16 weeks of gestation.

Methods

Standard care was compared with a composite intervention consisting of education on recommended GWG according to IOM, application of personalised weight graph, formalised prescription of exercise and regular monitoring of GWG at every antenatal visit.

Outcome

The proportion of women gaining weight above IOM guidelines (1990) and mean GWG (kg) was compared between groups.

Results

In all, 445 women were randomised and 374 women remained for analysis after delivery. A majority of the women analysed were normal weight (72%). The intervention reduced the proportion of women who exceeded the IOM guidelines (41.1% versus 50.0%). The reduction was, however, not statistically significant (= 0.086). Mean GWG was significantly lower among women receiving the intervention, 14.2 kg (SD 4.4) versus 15.3 kg (SD 5.4) in the standard care group (= 0.029).

Conclusions

The low-cost intervention programme tested did significantly reduce the mean GWG but the proportion of women who exceeded the IOM recommendations for GWG was not significantly lower.

ClinicalTrials.gov Id NCT00451425 http://clinicaltrials.gov