Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Delivery of singleton preterm infants in New South Wales, 1990–1997

Corresponding Author

Christine L. Roberts

Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of Sydney,

: Dr Christine Roberts, Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, Building DO2, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author

Charles S. Algert,

Charles S. Algert

Institute for International Health, University of Sydney,

Search for more papers by this author

Camille Raynes-Greenow,

Camille Raynes-Greenow

Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of Sydney,

Search for more papers by this author

Brian Peat,

Brian Peat

King George V Memorial Hospital for Mothers and Babies, Sydney and

Search for more papers by this author

David J. Henderson-Smart,

David J. Henderson-Smart

Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of Sydney,

King George V Memorial Hospital for Mothers and Babies, Sydney and

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author

Christine L. Roberts,

Corresponding Author

Christine L. Roberts

Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of Sydney,

: Dr Christine Roberts, Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, Building DO2, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author

Charles S. Algert,

Charles S. Algert

Institute for International Health, University of Sydney,

Search for more papers by this author

Camille Raynes-Greenow,

Camille Raynes-Greenow

Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of Sydney,

Search for more papers by this author

Brian Peat,

Brian Peat

King George V Memorial Hospital for Mothers and Babies, Sydney and

Search for more papers by this author

David J. Henderson-Smart,

David J. Henderson-Smart

Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of Sydney,

King George V Memorial Hospital for Mothers and Babies, Sydney and

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 03 February 2003

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0004-8666.2003.00008.x

Citations: 9

Share a link

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Wechat

Abstract

Objective: To examine trends in the maternal characteristics and delivery of singleton preterm infants in an Australian population.

Design: Population-based descriptive study.

Setting: New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

Population: The population included 37 500 singleton preterm births from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 1997.

Methods: Data were obtained from the NSW Midwives’ Data Collection (MDC) and rates over time were calculated. Preterm birth by Caesarean section before the onset of labour or where labour was induced were considered to be medically indicated.

Main outcome measures: Preterm rates, medically indicated preterm birth rates, mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes, and trends over time.

Results: Among singleton infants, there was no significant change over time in the rate of preterm birth (annual average 5.5%), preterm births that were medically indicated (annual average 29.3%) or neonatal outcomes of preterm births. The rate of indicated preterm birth varied by gestational age and was highest (39.7%) at 29–32 weeks’ gestation. Instrumental preterm births declined over time from 9.5 to 7.8% with a shift from forceps to vacuum use and episiotomy rates declined from 19.7 to 14.8%.

Conclusions: Increases in the reported overall preterm rate (singletons and multiples) were not due to increased delivery of singleton infants. Changes in the management of singleton preterm births were similar to changes observed in term births such as decreasing forceps and episiotomy usage. It may be to time to reassess whether Australian clinicians would be willing to randomise patients to clinical trials of the best method of delivery for preterm infants.

References

1 Goldenberg RL, Dwight DJ. Prevention of premature birth. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 313–320.
10.1056/NEJM199807303390506
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
2 Roberts JM. Recent advances: obstetrics. BMJ. 2000; 321: 33–35.
10.1136/bmj.321.7252.33
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
3 Kramer MS, Demissie K, Yang H, Platt RW, Sauve R, Liston R. The contribution of mild and moderate preterm birth to infant mortality. Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. JAMA. 2000; 284: 843–849.
10.1001/jama.284.7.843
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
4 Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Wilkinson AR. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. Epicure Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 378–384.
10.1056/NEJM200008103430601
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
5 Joseph KS, Kramer MS, Marcoux S et al. Determinants of preterm birth rates in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 1434–1439.
10.1056/NEJM199811123392004
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
6 Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Ananth CV et al. Trends in preterm birth and neonatal mortality among blacks and whites in the United States from 1989 to 1997. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 154: 307–315.
10.1093/aje/154.4.307
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
7 Olsen P, Laara E, Rantakallio P et al. Epidemiology of preterm delivery in two birth cohorts with an interval of 20 years. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 142: 1184–1193.
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117577
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
8 Breart G, Blondel B, Tuppin P, Grandjean H, Kaminski M. Did preterm deliveries continue to decrease in France in the 1980s? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1995; 9: 296–306.
10.1111/j.1365-3016.1995.tb00146.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
9 Luo ZC, Karlberg J. Timing of birth and infant and early neonatal mortality in Sweden 1973–95: longitudinal birth register study. BMJ. 2001; 323: 1327–1330.
10.1136/bmj.323.7325.1327
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
10 NSW Health Department. NSW Midwives Data Collection 1990. NSW Public Health Bulletin (Suppl.). Sydney: NSW Health Department. State Publication no. (EHSEB) 93–19, 1993.
Google Scholar
11 NSW Health Department. NSW Mothers and babies 1999. NSW Public Health Bulletin (Suppl.). Sydney: NSW Health Department. State Publication no. (PH) 010005, 2001.
Google Scholar
12 Kogan MD, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M et al. Trends in twin birth outcomes and prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981–1997. JAMA. 2000; 284: 335–341.
10.1001/jama.284.3.335
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
13 Roberts CL, Algert CS, Morris JM, Henderson-Smart D. Trends in the management of twin births 1990–1999. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002; 78: 213–219.
10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00147-9
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
14 Pym M, Taylor L. Validation study of the NSW Midwives Data Collection 1990. NSW Public Health Bulletin (Suppl.). State Publication No. (EHSEB) 93–167. 1993: 4 (Suppl. 8): 1–6.
Google Scholar
15 NSW Health Department. Validation Study: NSW Midwives Data Collection 1998. In: NSW Mothers and Babies 1998. NSW Public Health Bulletin (Suppl.) State Publication no. (EPI) 000029. 2000; 9 (Suppl. 2): 97–99.
Google Scholar
16 Roberts CL, Lancaster PA. Australian national birthweight percentiles by gestational age. Med J Aust. 1999; 170: 114–118.
10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb127678.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
17 Armitage P, Berry G. Chapter 12: Further analysis of categorical data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1987, 371–374.
Google Scholar
18 Roberts CL, Taylor L, Henderson-Smart D. Trends in births at and beyond term: evidence of a change? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106: 937–942.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08433.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
19 Roberts CL, Raynes-Greenow CH, Algert CS, Peat B. Higher order multiple pregnancies in New South Wales 1990–1999. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 42: 51–54.
10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00057.x
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
20 Keirse MJNC. Preterm delivery. In: I Chalmers, M Enkin, MJNC Keirse (eds) Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989, 1270–1292.
Google Scholar
21 Grant A, Glazener CMA. Elective caesarean section versus expectant management of the small baby (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2002.
Google Scholar
22 Lumley J, Lester A, Renou P, Wood C. A failed RCT to determine the best method of delivery for very low birth weight infants. Control Clin Trials. 1985; 6: 120–127.
10.1016/0197-2456(85)90117-5
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
23 Carroli G, Belizan J. Episiotomy for vaginal birth (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2002.
Google Scholar
24 Johanson RB, Menon V. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2002.
Google Scholar
25 Hannah M, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Hodnett E, Saigal S, Willan A. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaberative Group. Lancet. 2000; 356: 1375–1383.
10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume43, Issue1

February 2003

Pages 32-37

Delivery of singleton preterm infants in New South Wales, 1990–1997

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Delivery of singleton preterm infants in New South Wales, 1990–1997

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information