Volume 123, Issue 3 p. 221-225
Clinical articles

Promoters of and barriers to cervical cancer screening in a rural setting in Tanzania

Powell Perng

Powell Perng

Center for Global Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Wei Perng

Wei Perng

Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Twalib Ngoma

Twalib Ngoma

Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Search for more papers by this author
Crispin Kahesa

Crispin Kahesa

Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Search for more papers by this author
Julius Mwaiselage

Julius Mwaiselage

Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Search for more papers by this author
Sofia D. Merajver

Corresponding Author

Sofia D. Merajver

Center for Global Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA

Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA

Corresponding author at: 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA. Tel.: + 1 734 936 6884; fax: + 1 734 936 7376.Search for more papers by this author
Amr S. Soliman

Amr S. Soliman

Department of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 September 2013
Citations: 31

Abstract

Objective

To investigate promoters and barriers for cervical cancer screening in rural Tanzania.

Methods

We interviewed 300 women of reproductive age living in Kiwangwa village, Tanzania. The odds of attending a free, 2-day screening service were compared with sociodemographic variables, lifestyle factors, and knowledge and attitudes surrounding cervical cancer using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Compared with women who did not attend the screening service (n = 195), women who attended (n = 105) were older (OR 4.29; 95% CI, 1.61–11.48, age 40–49 years versus 20–29 years), listened regularly to the radio (OR 24.76; 95% CI, 11.49–53.33, listened to radio 1–3 times per week versus not at all), had a poorer quality of life (OR 4.91; CI, 1.96–12.32, lowest versus highest score), had faced cost barriers to obtaining health care in the preceding year (OR 2.24; 95% CI, 1.11–4.53, yes versus no), and held a more positive attitude toward cervical cancer screening (OR 4.64; 95% CI, 1.39–15.55, least versus most averse).

Conclusion

Efforts aimed at improving screening rates in rural Tanzania need to address both structural and individual-level barriers, including knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer prevention, cost barriers to care, and access to health information.