Methodology and tools for quality improvement in maternal and newborn health care
Corresponding Author
Joanna Raven
Maternal and Newborn Health Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
Corresponding author at: Maternal and Newborn Health Unit, Child and Reproductive Health Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK. Tel.: + 44 151 705 3257; fax: + 44 151 705 3329.Search for more papers by this authorJan Hofman
Maternal and Newborn Health Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAdetoro Adegoke
Maternal and Newborn Health Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
Search for more papers by this authorNynke van den Broek
Maternal and Newborn Health Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Joanna Raven
Maternal and Newborn Health Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
Corresponding author at: Maternal and Newborn Health Unit, Child and Reproductive Health Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK. Tel.: + 44 151 705 3257; fax: + 44 151 705 3329.Search for more papers by this authorJan Hofman
Maternal and Newborn Health Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAdetoro Adegoke
Maternal and Newborn Health Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
Search for more papers by this authorNynke van den Broek
Maternal and Newborn Health Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Objective
To gain an overview of approaches, methodologies, and tools used in quality improvement of maternal and newborn health in low-income countries.
Methods
Electronic search of MEDLINE and organizational databases for literature describing approaches, methodologies, and tools used to improve the quality of maternal and newborn health care in low-income countries. Relevant papers and reports were reviewed and summarized.
Results
Developing a culture of quality is an important requisite for successful quality improvement. Methodologies to improve quality include the development of standards and guidelines and the performance of mortality, near-miss, and criterion-based audits. Tools for data collection and process description were identified, and examples of work to improve quality of care are provided.
Conclusion
The documented experience with the identified approaches, methodologies, and tools indicates that none is sufficient by itself to achieve a desirable improvement in quality of care. The choice of methodologies and tools depends on the healthcare system and its available resources. There is a lack of studies that describe the process of quality improvement and a need for research to provide evidence of the effectiveness of the identified methods and tools.
References
- [1]Hogan M.C., Foreman K.J., Naghavi M., Ahn S.Y., Wang M., Makela S.M., et alMaternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet. 375(9726): 2010; 1609–1623
- [2]Lawn J.E., Cousens S., Bhutta Z.A., Darmstadt G.L., Martines J., Paul V., et alWhy are 4 million newborn babies dying each year?. Lancet. 364(9432): 2004; 399–401
- [3] World Health Organization. Reducing maternal deaths: a challenge for the new millennium in the African region. 2005; WHO Regional Office for Africa: Brazzaville
- [4]Fauveau V., de Bernis L.. “Good obstetrics” revisited: too many evidence-based practices and devices are not used. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 94(2): 2006; 179–184
- [5]Althabe F., Bergel E., Cafferata M.L., Gibbons L., Ciapponi A., Alemán A., et alStrategies for improving the quality of health care in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 22(Suppl. 1): 2008; 42–60
- [6]Wagaarachchi P.T., Fernando L.. Trends in maternal mortality and assessment of substandard care in a tertiary care hospital. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 101(1): 2002; 36–40
- [7]Pattinson R.C.. Saving mothers: third report on confidential enquiry into maternal deaths in South Africa 2002–2004. 2006; Government Printers: Pretoria
- [8]Pittrof R., Campbell O.M., Filippi V.G.. What is quality in maternity care? An international perspective. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 81(4): 2002; 277–283
- [9]Ovretveit J.. Health service quality. An introduction to quality methods for health services. 1992; Blackwell Publications: Oxford
- [10] Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm. 2001; National Academy Press: Washington DChttp://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309072808
- [11]Donabedian A.. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: the definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. 1980; Health Administration Press: Ann Arbor, MI
- [12]Lin Y.. Designing quality essential obstetric care services in Honduras: quality assurance project case study. www.qaproject.orghttp://www.qaproject.org/pubs/PDFs/hondurascasestudy.pdf, Published 2000
- [13]Kelley E.H., Abdallah H., El-Karimi A., Knebel E.. Quality improvement teams in Morocco: an evaluation of functionality and success. www.qaproject.orghttp://www.qaproject.org/pubs/PDFs/ORS/Morocco.%20Quality%20improvement%20teams.%20Summary.pdf, Published 2002
- [14]Bouchet B., Francisco M., Ovretveit J.. The Zambia quality assurance program: successes and challenges. Int J Qual Health Care. 14(Suppl. 1): 2002; 89–95
- [15]Umar N., Litaker D., Terris D.D.. Toward more sustainable health care quality improvement in developing countries: the “little steps” approach. Qual Manag Health Care. 18(4): 2009; 295–304
- [16] Department of Health. Standards for better health. www.dh.gov.ukhttp://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4086665, Published 2004
- [17]Kongnyuy E.J., van den Broek N.. Developing standards for postpartum hemorrhage in a resource-limited country. Health Care Women Int. 30(11): 2009; 989–1002
- [18]Turner T.J., Short J., SEA-ORCHID Study Group. Maternal and perinatal guideline development in hospitals in South East Asia: the experience of the SEA-ORCHID project. Health Res Policy Syst. 7: 2009; 10
- [19]Belizan M., Meier A., Althabe F., Codazzi A., Colomar M., Buekens P., et alFacilitators and barriers to adoption of evidence-based perinatal care in Latin American hospitals: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res. 22(6): 2007; 839–853
- [20] World Health Organisation. Beyond the numbers: reviewing maternal deaths and complications to make pregnancy safer. www.who.inthttp://www.who.int/making_pregnancy_safer/documents/9241591838/en/index.html, Published 2004
- [21]Pattinson R., Kerber K., Waiswa P., Day L.T., Mussell F., Asiruddin S.K., et alPerinatal mortality audit: counting, accountability, and overcoming challenges in scaling up in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 107(Suppl. 1): 2009; S113–S121, S121–2
- [22]Mbaruku G., Bergström S.. Reducing maternal mortality in Kigoma. Tanzania Health Policy Plan. 10(1): 1995; 71–78
- [23]Dumont A., Gaye A., de Bernis L., Chaillet N., Landry A., Delage J., et alFacility-based maternal death reviews: effects on maternal mortality in a district hospital in Senegal. Bull World Health Organ. 84(3): 2006; 218–224
- [24]Kongnyuy E.J., Leigh B., van den Broek N.. Effect of audit and feedback on the availability, utilisation and quality of emergency obstetric care in three districts in Malawi. Women Birth. 21(4): 2008; 149–155
- [25]Supratikto G., Wirth M.E., Achadi E., Cohen S., Ronsmans C.. A district-based audit of the causes and circumstances of maternal deaths in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Bull World Health Organ. 80(3): 2002; 228–234
- [26]Kongnyuy E.J., van den Broek N.. The difficulties of conducting maternal death reviews in Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 8: 2008; 42
- [27] CEMACH. Confidential enquiry into maternal and child health. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer. 2007; CEMACH: London
- [28]Say L., Souza J.P., Pattinson R.C.. WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications. Maternal near miss—towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 23(3): 2009; 287–296
- [29]Filippi V., Richard F., Lange I., Ouattara F.. Identifying barriers from home to the appropriate hospital through near-miss audits in developing countries. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 23(3): 2009; 389–400
- [30]Kongnyuy E.J., Mlava G., van den Broek N.. Using criteria-based audit to improve the management of postpartum haemorrhage in resource limited countries: a case study of Malawi. Matern Child Health J. 13(6): 2009; 873–878
- [31]Kongnyuy E.J., van den Broek N.. Criteria for clinical audit of women friendly care and providers' perception in Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 8: 2008; 28
- [32]Jamtvedt G., Young J.M., Kristoffersen D.T., O'Brien M.A., Oxman A.D.. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(2): 2006; CD000259
- [33] EngenderHealth. COPE Handbook: a process for quality improvement in health services. 2003; EngenderHealth: New York
- [34] IMMPACT. Immpact Toolkit. A guide and tools for maternal mortality programme assessment. 2007; IMMPACT: Aberdeen
- [35]Lomoro O.A., Ehiri J.E., Qian X., Tang S.L.. Mothers' perspectives on the quality of postpartum care in Central Shanghai, China. Int J Qual Health Care. 14(5): 2002; 393–402
- [36]Hounton S., Sombié I., Meda N., Bassane B., Byass P., Stanton C., et alMethods for evaluating effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a Skilled Care Initiative in rural Burkina Faso. Trop Med Int Health. 13(Suppl. 1): 2008; 14–24
- [37]Sullivan T.M., Sophia N., Maung C.. Using evidence to improve reproductive health quality along the Thailand-Burma border. Disasters. 28(3): 2004; 255–268
- [38]Li V.C., Shaoxian W., Kunyi W., Wentao Z., Buchthal O., Wong G.C., et alCapacity building to improve women's health in rural China. Soc Sci Med. 52(2): 2001; 279–292
- [39]Campbell P.C., Olufunlayo T.F., Onyenwenyi A.O.. An assessment of client satisfaction with services at a model primary health care centre in Ogun State, Nigeria. Nig Q J Hosp Med. 20(1): 2010; 13–18
- [40]Colligan L., Anderson J.E., Potts H.W., Berman J.. Does the process map influence the outcome of quality improvement work? A comparison of a sequential flow diagram and a hierarchical task analysis diagram. BMC Health Serv Res. 10: 2010; 7
- [41]Sethi S., Belliard J.C.. Participatory health assessment in Haiti: practical tools for community empowerment. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 3(3): 2009; 257–264
- [42]Mielke E., Bradley J., Becker J.. Improving Maternal and Child Health Services through COPE. 2001; Engender Health: New York
- [43]Wang C.C., Wang Y., Zhang K., Fang J., Liu W., Luo S., et alReproductive health indicators for China's rural areas. Soc Sci Med. 57(2): 2003; 217–225
- [44]Santos C., Diante D.Jr., Baptista A., Matediane E., Bique C., Bailey P.. Improving emergency obstetric care in Mozambique: the story of Sofala. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 94(2): 2006; 190–201
- [45]MacDuffie H., DePoy E.. Force field analysis: a model for promoting adolescents' involvement in their own health care. Health Promot Pract. 5(3): 2004; 306–313