Volume 157, Issue 1 p. 11-18
REVIEW ARTICLE

The impact of natural disasters and epidemics on sexual and reproductive health in low- and middle-income countries: A narrative synthesis

Samantha Loewen

Samantha Loewen

Research and Evaluation, Action Research, Brooklyn, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jessie Pinchoff

Corresponding Author

Jessie Pinchoff

Department of Poverty, Gender and Youth, Population Council, New York, NY, USA

Correspondence

Jessie Pinchoff, Population Council, One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza #3, New York, NY, 10017, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Thoai D. Ngo

Thoai D. Ngo

Department of Poverty, Gender and Youth, Population Council, New York, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Michelle J. Hindin

Michelle J. Hindin

Department of Reproductive Health, Population Council, New York, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 May 2021
Citations: 11

Abstract

Background

Natural disasters and epidemics can strain already-fragile health systems, diverting resources away from essential sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, threatening supply chains, and adversely impacting access to health facilities.

Objective

To describe how natural disasters and epidemics affect multiple dimensions of SRH service delivery and outcomes, and identify potential approaches to facilitate resumption of services.

Search strategy

Key words searched in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus.

Selection criteria

Studies published in English between 2005 and 2020 covering events in low- and middle-income countries.

Data collection and analysis

This review was developed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2009 checklist. The initial electronic database searching yielded 64 345 studies, but after screening 13 studies were included in the final review.

Main results

Across contexts, disruptive events worsened the availability of and women's access to SRH services, contributed to decreased utilization of SRH services, and often resulted in lower use of family planning, particularly methods requiring facility-based interaction.

Conclusion

SRH in disaster response plans must be prioritized, as women often lose access to these essential services at a time when they are at their most vulnerable. Evidence regarding effective interventions and policies is lacking.

Synopsis

Availability, utilization, and quality of SRH services are impacted during natural disasters and epidemics but often quick to resume, which is critical for gender equity.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest.