Volume 138, Issue 2 p. 164-170
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Use of a geographic information system to assess accessibility to health facilities providing emergency obstetric and newborn care in Bangladesh

Mahbub E. Chowdhury

Corresponding Author

Mahbub E. Chowdhury

International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Correspondence

Mahbub E. Chowdhury, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Taposh K. Biswas

Taposh K. Biswas

International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Search for more papers by this author
Monjur Rahman

Monjur Rahman

International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Search for more papers by this author
Kamal Pasha

Kamal Pasha

Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Search for more papers by this author
Mollah A. Hossain

Mollah A. Hossain

Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Institute of Water Modelling, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 April 2017
Citations: 7

Abstract

Objective

To use a geographic information system (GIS) to determine accessibility to health facilities for emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmONC) and compare coverage with that stipulated by UN guidelines (5 EmONC facilities per 500 000 individuals, ≥1 comprehensive).

Methods

A cross-sectional study was undertaken of all public facilities providing EmONC in 24 districts of Bangladesh from March to October 2012. Accessibility to each facility was assessed by applying GIS to estimate the proportion of catchment population (comprehensive 500 000; basic 100 000) able to reach the nearest facility within 2 hours and 1 hour of travel time, respectively, by existing road networks.

Results

The minimum number of public facilities providing comprehensive and basic EmONC services (1 and 5 per 500 000 individuals, respectively) was reached in 16 and 3 districts, respectively. However, after applying GIS, in no district did 100% of the catchment population have access to these services. A minimum of 75% and 50% of the population had accessibility to comprehensive services in 11 and 5 districts, respectively. For basic services, accessibility was much lower.

Conclusion

Assessing only the number of EmONC facilities does not ensure universal coverage; accessibility should be assessed when planning health systems.